Over and over atheists make the “moral” argument against Christianity by throwing the conquest of Canaan at the Christian. The argument goes that God commanded genocide, genocide is immoral, therefore God does not exist. 

This is a non-sequitur as God commanding something of the sort is not proof he does not exist, but the default response then is that he is immoral. However their very premise is unproven and misleading.

In their argument there’s a lot of context missing.

God gave them grace

“16 In the fourth generation your descendants will come back here, for the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its full measure.””

Genesis 15:16

Here were their sins that are conveniently left out of by the objectors.


1. They passed their children through fire (Child Sacrifice).

Deuteronomy 12:31
You must not worship the LORD your God in this way, because they practice for their gods every abomination which the LORD hates. They even burn their sons and daughters in the fire as sacrifices to their gods.

The Amorites are detailed here in particular, and this may have been practiced in Canaan also (YouTube). Watch it if you dare, but Amorite child sacrifice involved the dismemberment of children in worship of a serpent God. Tell me it doesn’t sound like a mockery of Genesis 3:14-15‘s promise for the seed of the woman to crush the serpent.

The Cult of Molech, heavily practiced in Canaan, involved the burning of infants alive upon a scorching hot altar. There was ritual of song, music, chanting to drown out the wails of the infant that developed over time. Oaths were made and promises for prosperity and eventually the idol was even mechanized. This roasting infant’s bearing God’s image is what God was judging, but there was more.

Depiction of child sacrifice in the cult of Molech


2.Sexual sin

Some of these our culture likes these days (homosexuality is listed) but for the moment our culture finds many on the list detestable as these include bestiality and incest.


The Lord said to Moses, 2 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘I am the Lord your God. 3 You must not do as they do in Egypt, where you used to live, and you must not do as they do in the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you. Do not follow their practices. 4 You must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees. I am the Lord your God. 5 Keep my decrees and laws, for the person who obeys them will live by them. I am the Lord.

6 “‘No one is to approach any close relative to have sexual relations. I am the Lord.

7 “‘Do not dishonor your father by having sexual relations with your mother. She is your mother; do not have relations with her.

8 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your father’s wife; that would dishonor your father.

9 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your sister, either your father’s daughter or your mother’s daughter, whether she was born in the same home or elsewhere.

10 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your son’s daughter or your daughter’s daughter; that would dishonor you.

11 “‘Do not have sexual relations with the daughter of your father’s wife, born to your father; she is your sister.

12 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your father’s sister; she is your father’s close relative.

13 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your mother’s sister, because she is your mother’s close relative.

14 “‘Do not dishonor your father’s brother by approaching his wife to have sexual relations; she is your aunt.

15 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your daughter-in-law. She is your son’s wife; do not have relations with her.

16 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your brother’s wife; that would dishonor your brother.

17 “‘Do not have sexual relations with both a woman and her daughter. Do not have sexual relations with either her son’s daughter or her daughter’s daughter; they are her close relatives. That is wickedness.

18 “‘Do not take your wife’s sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living.

19 “‘Do not approach a woman to have sexual relations during the uncleanness of her monthly period.

20 “‘Do not have sexual relations with your neighbor’s wife and defile yourself with her.

21 “‘Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molek, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord.

22 “‘Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.

23 “‘Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion.

24 “‘Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. 25 Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. 26 But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the foreigners residing among you must not do any of these detestable things, 27 for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. 28 And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you.

Leviticus 18

In the ancient world, three elements of societies are seen as linked together, and you see them in Leviticus 18. This system colors the conquest, shaping the commands God gave to Israel. Its components are.


Land/cities
Gods (religion)
Peoples

The reason for God’s command to destroy the nations was to break the system so Israel wouldn’t follow after them for themselves. Due to the Canaanites sin the land was defiled, and the system needed to be destroyed. If the nations persisted, so would the cultures. If these continued, so would the idolatry and all the atrocities. If they remained, they would become a temptation to the children of Israel. God, being moral and reasonable says so himself.

This explains the annihilation command.

 You shall make no covenant with them and their gods. 33 They shall not dwell in your land, lest they make you sin against me; for if you serve their gods, it will surely be a snare to you.”

Exodus 23:32-33



In fact, the warning to remove them lest they be a snare is repeated several times (Exodus 23:13, 23:32-34, 34:11-16, Deuteronomy 7:1-5, 12:30, 20:16-18).

They failed (Judges 1) and wouldn’t you know it.

You even took the sons and daughters you bore to Me and sacrificed them as food to idols. Was your prostitution not enough? You slaughtered My children and delivered them up through the fire to idols.

Ezekiel 16:20-21

The command was apocalyptic in language; however, we have precedent that tells us other outcomes were possible. Some converted, including Jesus’s ancestor Rahab her story is in Joshua 2, and she appears in Jesus genealogy.

Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab,

Matthew 1:5


The objector often spouts a one-line gotcha they found on the internet, or intentionally leaves out the details of the conquest. The real issues rest with them.

How could a jus, holy and loving God, leave that level of sin in a society unpunished?

Where do any objectors get their morality from?

For an atheist we are all just wads of chemicals bouncing around an impersonal, wholly non-moral universe. They can’t make the moral case, but being in God’s image they testify to their knowledge of him by making moral judgments (Romans 2:14-16).

For an atheist there are no values just chemical reactions we call value and anything that happens is just the process of the universe/history. If you want morality and justice on any foundation that holds, you have to be a Christian.

Eastern religions like Buddhism or Hinduism just believe in Karma (what goes around comes around). This solves nothing for them either, the conclusion being the Canaanites all had it coming to them. So, what’s the objection?

The idea that genocide might be a bad thing is a Christian idea, since all mankind is made of one blood and bearing his image (Genesis 1:27, Genesis 3:20, Genesis 9:19, Acts 17:26), all nations are in the scope of salvation and have dignity (Matthew 28:19-20, Revelation 7:9) and all can have access to God, both examples create the idea of human rights. If you use the slaughter of the Canaanites as an objection, you are ignorant, but you are also indebted to Christianity and would make a good Christian.

What does that mean for us today as Christians? Aside from the solid answers to the objections, we see a lot about the depravity of sin. The human heart is deceitful and wicked (Jeremiah 17:9). The Penalty for sin is severe, and justifiably so.

The world outside of Christ is dangerous, so through the Gospel, conquer. Those snares still exist, they merely take on a modern facade. We sacrifice our children, we just do so while they are in the womb like “liberated/civilized” people. We justify further and further perversions in the name of “love” in an age where love has become impossible to find or even define. You, Christian, are called to be something different, and to spread the truth of the Gospel, turning this Canaan into a promised land and it’s Canaanites (which you once were) into the people of promise.

Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.

Romans 12:2


9 responses to “The Cleansing of Canaan”

  1. the argument goes:

    no evidence for your god, thus your god doesn’t exist.

    happily, the genocidal lunatic you worship is imaginary and all of that garbage in the OT never happened. It just shows just how pathetic christians can be, in their need to obey such a vicious failure.

    Like

    1. May I ask where you get your standards from? What is man that he is the measure? Why is the morality or logic of one man superior to that of another? (Assuming you believe that is the case)
      Where do you get your morality from?

      If it didn’t happen why are you upset about it?

      The truth of the matter is there is plenty of evidence, from nature, history and others that best fits the reality of the unmoved mover known as the biblical God. But judging by your empty assertions based on ad hominems on a humanistic basis I don’t know that you want the truth.

      Nobody believed in the Hitites because they were in scripture, or the personhood of king David (we have pottery and other ceramics with his name and reign inscribed), or Joshua and yet we have the mount Ebal curse tablet, the destruction of Canaanite idols. We have Hezekiah’s seal, Jezebel’s seal

      The abuse by a few does not disprove the reality of the thing in question. Without an absolute moral law giver, and a personal creator we don’t have right and wrong we just have chemical reactions. Without a self-sustaining necessary being, the universe has no beginning, but it clearly does (the unmoved mover argument), and even an ordered universe demands one to order it. If you want logic, reason, the scientific method and the morality to say those who have done wrong morally (to you or others) you need the biblical God).

      Like

      1. JH, you try the common theist attempt to claim that I can’t have morals or standards unless you god exists. That fails every single time a theist uses it since theists can’t agree on what morals their various gods supposedly give them. you all make up your iamginary friend in your images.

        Christians are one of the best examples of this since your cult has splintered into hundreds if not more versions. Christians also have the problem that they must invent excuses why their god doesn’t have to follow the morality they claim their god gave them, when it commits genocide, kills people for things they didn’t do, etc. This shows your morality to be entirely subjective, dependent on who/what someone is rather than any objective morality always associated with an action.

        Morality is a human invention and as such is subjective. Happily so, since we can throw out your ignorant nonsense.

        I can be upset about events that are wrong even if they didn’t happen. That’s what fiction is for.

        Unsurprisingly, for all of your claims of “plenty of evidence” you can provide not a single piece of it. And gee, one more ignorant christian who has no idea what an ad hominem fallacy is. You simply lie and claim I don’t want the truth, so you can hide your utter lack of having any.

        It’s hilarious when chrsitians try to use that old story about the hittites. It was no more than a matter of time to have found them, the bible was not needed to show they existed.

        You have no ceramics showing the david from the bible. You have a curse tablet that shwos that jews believed in nonsense but not that the nonsense was true. You have some mentions of real places and people in your bible. Hmm, if that i evidence the magic nonsense in it is true, then the greek gods are as real as yours.

        You are no different than those “few” you typically attack. You are a failure. Yep, we are indeed chemical reactions and the emergent processes from them. Still no imaginary friend needed.

        That the universe has a beginning doesn’t require your ignorant god, dear. Your god isn’t necessary at all. That is simple a presupposition that theists make, and they can’t show it to be true. You simply try to define your blood god into what is needed. Happily. deduction doesn’t work that was.

        Like

      2. Plurality does not disprove an objective individual, and you make an objective truth claim that there is only
        subjectivev reality. Only one of is lives in a coherent world. The only conclusion I can reach is that you
        just don’t like Christianity. You’re accusations are empty, ad hominem, illogical and non-sequitors. You aren’t really
        addressing the issues and didn’t from the getgo.

        If morality is subjective you have no objection. It all becomes who is strongest, and my “imaginary friend” is no more right or wrong than your imaginary morality by your own logic. You have a preference and are wasting your time. You are borrowing from my God to pretend he doesn’t exist. You know this, and I am all but certain you won’t accept you but I feel sorry for you. You are not a happy person, you don’t have peace, and it shows. You move the goalpoasts all you want, I showed you the bible has a basis in history, I can do it all day but you will simply refuse to accept it. You have shown that. You are an evolutionist, your God is bloodier than mine.
        And I would be wasting my time to continue to engage with you further. It would be the proverbial pearls before swine.

        Take it for what it’s worth, but I hope you find the peace that can only be found in Christ.

        Like

      1. nice video example of how christians have to lie.

        Like

    2. May I ask if this is coming from some personal experience?

      Like

      1. oh dear, jh is trying to convince himself that no one can question his imaginary friend unless they’ve been “hurt”.

        Like

      2. You know that’s not what I said. You also refuse to actually engage with my material. You are not after serious intellectual discussion. I will not waste my time with someone who is

        Like

Leave a comment

Trending